About the staff
6 Ways To Achieve Natural Arthritis Pain Relief
California Mother Speaks Out Against Environmental Working Group Study
Choosing the Right Glucose Meter
Erase Pain in Mere Minutes
Keep Eyes Safely on the Ball
Measuring Vision With Field Tests
New Treatment for Chronic Non-healing Wounds Unveiled
Where to buy emu meat
The Last Page
California Mother Speaks Out Against Environmental Working
Mother Rejects Anti-Fire Retardant Groups and Embraces Fire Safety
SACRAMENTO, Calif., Sept. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- Elizabeth Perrott, mother and member
of the medical community, spoke out against the Environmental Working Group's
new study that discourages the use of fire retardants, because of the
undetermined negative effects it may have on children. "As a mother, my children
and their safety are my number one priority, which is why I am very concerned
about the recent outcry toward fire retardants," said Perrott.
Perrott raised concerns that this kind of study would incite fear in mothers
about the safety of fire retardants without due cause. "The fact is that fire
retardants save lives," said Perrott. The Environmental Working Group's (EWG)
study looks at the concentration of fire retardants in mothers and children,
noting that concentrations were higher in children than in their mothers.
However, the study fails to mention the countless other chemicals that are found
in varying concentrations in both children and adults. The study names DECA as a
chemical of high concern because it is a "heavily used flame retardant." The
study does not mention that DECA is the most widely used flame retardant because
it is the most widely studied and understood flame retardant on the market.
State legislatures across the nation continue to affirm the safety and
effectiveness of DECA, despite numerous attempts by environmental agencies to
ban its use.
What proponents of these kinds of bans fail to realize is that the fire
retardants are crucial to public health and safety. Without adequate fire
protection, many of the household items we use on a daily basis become
dangerously vulnerable to ignition. "I should not have to worry about having my
home go up in flames because of a simple candle or match because my furniture
hasn't been properly fire retarded," explained Perrott.
Last week the California Senate struck down AB 706, a recent attempt by the
Friends of the Earth to ban fire retardants in furniture. Proponents of the bill
had mischaracterized the benefits and risks of these fire safety tools and
focused on a campaign based on flawed science and raising unjustified fears
about the safety of these products.
All children should be able to live in a world without burn scars, and we should
do everything possible to ensure that the likelihood of this kind of emotional
and physical scarring is as uncommon as possible.
"Before we start advocating the removal of something that saves lives on the
basis of unfounded science, let's take a closer look at some of those who would
suffer the most. As a mother, I stand behind fire retardants and the lives they
save," said Perrot.
Fire advocacy group, Citizens for Fire Safety, recently conducted a test that
exemplifies the effectiveness of fire retardants in furniture. Two couches were
burned -- one treated with fire retardants and one without -- the couch that was
properly fire protected barely smoldered and the other ignited in seconds. Video
of the couch burn, and copies of the study, can found at http://www.cffsi.org/.
For more information on this issue, please visit http://www.cffsi.org/.